SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Security Research
6 Common Myths And Misbeliefs About Patching

6 Common Myths And Misbeliefs About Patching

Patching is one of the best security practices followed to fix software vulnerabilities. Studies show that much serious ransomware like WannaCry could have been easily prevented if software updates were patched on time. For cyber attackers, un-updated software is always a welcome sign to intrude the...

May 17, 2020By Dixitha S4 min read

Patching is one of the best security practices followed to fix software vulnerabilities. Studies show that much serious ransomware like WannaCry could have been easily prevented if software updates were patched on time. For cyber attackers, un-updated software is always a welcome sign to intrude the network. Even though, many of us know patching is crucial for enterprise security, there are various myths and misbeliefs which are still prevalent among the IT administrators. Auto patching with a patch management software can be beneficial to many. Patching is hard, time-consuming and challenging is what IT admins think and neglect to do it on time.

Here are the 6 common myths and misbeliefs about patching which must be taken care of:

1) “Patching is not a priority and it can be done later”

“Later” is the word which we avoid when it comes to updating missing patches. We never know that even a small delay might lead to serious security havocs. Many cybersecurity practitioners suggest that we should patch within a few hours from an available update. But many administrators are still neglecting software updates and are postponing it to a later time. Cybercriminals are working actively and even a small time-lapse will help them roll out a cyber-attack. Administrators should always ensure that they patch their endpoints without any delay. A patch management tool is essential.

2) “It patching enough if the software with most vulnerabilities are there”

This is another myth administrators often believe and practice in their network environment. In general, we might notice that many applications will nag their user to perform an update. We cannot neglect this. Just by patching the software with vulnerabilities will not save your network from security breaches. Recommending that all the applications which we install in the endpoints patch continuously irrespective of their vulnerability range.

3) “Patching third party applications is not important to secure network endpoints”

Administrators often believe that it is enough if they patch their Microsoft applications and ignore other third-party applications. But the fact is, a lot of security breaches have happened in the past by missing updates of various third-party applications like Adobe, Java, Firefox etc. Delta Charlie was an infamous botnet malware which highly exploited Adobe Flash player applications. All this clearly states that third-party application patching plays a vital role in safeguarding the systems from security threats.

4) “Security updates should not be deployed immediately”

Some organizations believe that security patches might change the application’s functionality and delay their deployment. Some even believe that it may lead to even more vulnerabilities. Studies show that “72% of managers are afraid to apply security patches right away because they could ‘break stuff’”. Out of all the updates that need patching, patching security updates is extremely crucial. To overcome this fear, administrators should rather test these updates in a test environment and immediately deploy them on other computers without any delay.

5) “If patching is done once, endpoints are secured”

Many IT administrators have the misconception that if patching is done after securing. It is important to note that patching is not a one-time process. Updates keep coming then and there. Every update contains a set of fixes with it and it is necessary to deploy them on the network endpoints. Patching is a continuous process that follow in the network regularly to secure the systems from potential attacks.

6) “Patching is a time-consuming process and it takes hours to complete”

There is no denial to the fact that patching consists of various steps from scanning missing updates, downloading patches from vendor sites to deploying them on multiple computers. But this should never stop an administrator from deploying the updates on time. We can automate these steps, and patching can still be an effortless process in securing the network.

SecPod SanerNow comes with an effective patching technology to put an end to all these patching myths and misbeliefs. With SanerNow, one can automate the complete steps of patch management is no time. All an IT administrator has to do is deploy the Saner agents on the endpoints, create automatic deployment tasks and easily enroll the patches on the enterprise computers.

Get a Free Trial of SecPod SanerNow and put all these patching misconceptions at bay. It is time to make patching a simple daily routine.

Featured Posts

Open Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212
Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212

CVE Research

Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212

CVE-2026-20212 is a critical vulnerability in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches that use Silicon One ASICs. It allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute code with root privileges by sending crafted input to TCP ports 43210 and 43211, which are reachable in the default Layer 3 VRF. Exploitation can also crash the S1HAL process and force a device reload. This article covers how the vulnerability works, the affected product identifiers, its potential impact, available workarounds, and how to identify fixed software using the Cisco Software Checker.

Sep 4, 2026

Open SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution
SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution

CVE Research

SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution

Sep 3, 2026

Open Introducing SecPod VEX Studio: Guided Vulnerability Exploitability Assessment for Open-Source Maintainers
Secpod_VEX_Studio For Open-Source Vulnerability Management

CVE Research

Introducing SecPod VEX Studio: Guided Vulnerability Exploitability Assessment for Open-Source Maintainers

A human-guided path from SBOM and vulnerability data to reviewable OpenVEX statements

Sep 2, 2026

Open Inside the PaperCut Zero-Day Attack Chain: Auth Bypass to Code Execution
Inside the PaperCut Zero-Day Attack Chain: Auth Bypass to Code Execution

CVE Research

Inside the PaperCut Zero-Day Attack Chain: Auth Bypass to Code Execution

Sep 1, 2026