SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Security Research
StringBleed, SNMP Authentication Bypass

StringBleed, SNMP Authentication Bypass

May 14, 2017By Rinu K2 min read

Strbleed or StringBleed is a critical flaw in implementing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). It leads to an access-control bypass, possibly involving an ISP customization in some cases. The authentication bypass vulnerability affects several IoT devices, which attackers can exploit by sending random values in specific requests. A good Vulnerability Management Tool can tackle these issues. The vulnerability is in track as CVE 2017-5135.

SNMP protocol has gone through different versions till now. There are three ways for client authentication and authentication on remote SNMP devices supported by SNMP protocol. They are named SNMPv1, SNMPv2, and SNMPv3. Two of these methods (SNMPv1, SNMPv2) are affecting by this authentication bypass vulnerability, which relies on a very simplistic authentication procedure that implies sending a human-readable string datatype value (usually public or private) inside an SNMP request from an SNMP client (app) to a device’s SNMP daemon. Vulnerability Management Software can prevent these attacks.

The device reads this string inside the SNMP request, called a “community string,” and replies to the SNMP client request, either with data or by executing an action. SNMP version 3 gives the option to use a user, password, and authentication methods. Therefore, the StringBleed issue resides in how SNMP agent running on different IoT devices handles a human-readable string datatype value called “community string,” which is used by SNMP version 1 and 2.

The Impact of StringBleed:

The Strbleed or StringBleed vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and could also allow attackers to execute code remotely on the vulnerable  SNMP device and get full read/write permission using any string/integer value. However, It may result in overwriting MIB(Management Information Base) files. And it allows attackers to retrieve the password and other sensitive information from the vulnerable device without guessing the community string.

An example of the exploit is below: (https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/67qt6u/cve_20175135_snmp_authentication_bypass)

The following devices in Shodan are not functioning cor by this vulnerability:https://www.shodan.io/search?query=DWG850-4

Here the string “sa90saioaKLJSA” has a successful authentication in the SNMP agent. That will happen with any other string integer value.

Around 78 vulnerable cable modem/router models are malfunctioning via StringBleeed. The table here lists the affected modem models.

Featured Posts

Open StyleSmuggler: Inside the Unpatched Magento Zero-Day Backdooring Live Stores
StyleSmuggler: Inside the Unpatched Magento Zero-Day Backdooring Live Stores

CVE Research

StyleSmuggler: Inside the Unpatched Magento Zero-Day Backdooring Live Stores

StyleSmuggler, an unpatched Magento and Adobe Commerce flaw letting attackers execute code without authentication via log poisoning, installing a persistent Linux backdoor that has already compromised live stores with no vendor patch available.

Sep 7, 2026

Open CVE-2026-6471: 12-Year-Old PostgreSQL PostGREShell Flaw Enables Server Takeover
CVE-2026-6471: 12-Year-Old PostgreSQL PostGREShell Vulnerability

CVE Research

CVE-2026-6471: 12-Year-Old PostgreSQL PostGREShell Flaw Enables Server Takeover

Sep 7, 2026

Open Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212
Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212

CVE Research

Root-Level RCE Flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches Exposes Networks to Complete Compromise — CVE-2026-20212

CVE-2026-20212 is a critical vulnerability in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches that use Silicon One ASICs. It allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute code with root privileges by sending crafted input to TCP ports 43210 and 43211, which are reachable in the default Layer 3 VRF. Exploitation can also crash the S1HAL process and force a device reload. This article covers how the vulnerability works, the affected product identifiers, its potential impact, available workarounds, and how to identify fixed software using the Cisco Software Checker.

Sep 4, 2026

Open SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution
SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution

CVE Research

SonicWall SMA 1000 Under Active Attack: Two Zero-Days Enable SSRF and Remote Code Execution

Sep 3, 2026