SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Security Research
MSSPs Take on Outsourced Security Challenge

MSSPs Take on Outsourced Security Challenge

The increased cost and complexity of securing the business IT infrastructure has opened the door for managed security service providers (MSSPs). In particular, small and medium businesses (SMBs) generally don’t have the security experience or resources to adequately protect their business from today...

Jan 21, 2016By SecPod2 min read

The increased cost and complexity of securing the business IT infrastructure has opened the door for managed security service providers (MSSPs). In particular, small and medium businesses (SMBs) generally don’t have the security experience or resources to adequately protect their business from today’s security threats. The days of simply configuring firewalls and deploying anti-virus software are long gone.

Most organizations are not in the business of providing IT security. Existing IT staff has been primarily engaged with ensuring the IT infrastructure is operational. When considering the necessary expertise and the burden of installing, configuring and managing security products, many companies prefer to outsource these activities. Security has become too complex and costly to handle internally. At the same time, the risk of security exploits continues to rise. And a security breach can be devastating to a company brand and regulatory compliance violations are costly.

MSSPs are stepping in to fulfill this security outsourcing need. Also, some traditional VARs are complementing their offerings with managed security services. This may include firewall management, intrusion detection and prevention, log management, Web content filtering, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, helpdesk and other services.

It’s interesting to compare MSSP managed service offerings. For example, an MSSP may provide vulnerability assessments, penetration testing and comprehensive risk reports. While it’s essential to know the overall security posture of a company, it’s even more important to actually mitigate the risks. Security products are now available that combine risk assessment with mitigation. For example, endpoint vulnerability scans are performed to detect issues and then systems are automatically patched and properly configured. This type of solution can be deployed to ensure all endpoint systems are proactively secured daily, minimizing risk of exploit. Risk detection and mitigation are combined into one effective process.

In some cases, MSSPs are building out major cyber centers to provide a complete outsourced security service. Economy of scale is provided by centralizing security staff expertise, hosting security products and providing security related helpdesk services.

Security vendors themselves are moving to support the MSSP market with products that include features to assist in managing multiple clients. Again, contributing to the efficiency of scale required my MSSPs.

SecPod Technologies has designed Saner Business to support MSSPs with a product that combines risk assessment and mitigation. This type of solution is a key component of a managed security service offering.

Featured Posts

Open Citrix Sounds the Alarm: Two Critical NetScaler Zero-Days Actively Exploited
Citrix Sounds the Alarm: Two Critical NetScaler Zero-Days Actively Exploited

CVE Research

Citrix Sounds the Alarm: Two Critical NetScaler Zero-Days Actively Exploited

Citrix has released security updates for NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway addressing CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772, two critical remote code execution vulnerabilities. Exploits against unmitigated deployments have been observed. CVE-2026-88771 affects all deployments, including default configurations; CVE-2026-88772 applies when DTLS is enabled, including the default state on VPN virtual servers. This article covers impact, affected and fixed versions, how to confirm exposure, and recommended remediation.

Sep 28, 2026

Open CVE-2023-49105: The ownCloud Authentication Flaw That Exposed Sensitive Credentials
CVE-2023-49105: The ownCloud Authentication Flaw That Exposed Sensitive Credentials

CVE Research

CVE-2023-49105: The ownCloud Authentication Flaw That Exposed Sensitive Credentials

Sep 25, 2026

Open Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: RouterOS SSH Attacks Predate Production Fixes in CISA's September 10, 2026 KEV Additions
Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: RouterOS SSH Attacks Predate Production Fixes in CISA's September 10, 2026 KEV Additions

CVE Research

Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: RouterOS SSH Attacks Predate Production Fixes in CISA's September 10, 2026 KEV Additions

Two MikroTik RouterOS CVEs entered CISA KEV seven days after production fixes. Dated reporting places SSH-chain exploitation involving CVE-2026-86060 at least one calendar day before those releases; no comparable start date is established for CVE-2026-67277.

Sep 25, 2026

Open Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: A Day-Old Chrome Bug and an Eight-Month-Old Fortinet Flaw Share the Same KEV Batch
Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: A Day-Old Chrome Bug and an Eight-Month-Old Fortinet Flaw Share the Same KEV Batch

CVE Research

Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: A Day-Old Chrome Bug and an Eight-Month-Old Fortinet Flaw Share the Same KEV Batch

Four vulnerabilities added to CISA’s KEV catalog on September 9, 2026 show widely different timelines between public disclosure and formal exploitation-based prioritization, ranging from one day to 239 days.

Sep 24, 2026