SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs

Key findings of CISCO ASR 2015

2015 CISCO Annual Security Report feels like a déjà vu. After all the song and dance, there are no surprises. Security has been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. People have always been used to gain access and continue to be unwitting participants.

Feb 2, 2015By Sindhu Rao3 min read

2015 CISCO Annual Security Report feels like a déjà vu. After all the song and dance, there are no surprises. Security has been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. People have always been used to gain access and continue to be unwitting participants.

The end points in an enterprise are often open invitations to attackers. The reluctance on the part of end users to patch their systems regularly, provides an easy entry for perpetrators to use them to access the network.

It is heartening to see a declining tendency in the cumulative vulnerabilities reported in 2014 compared to the total number reported in 2013. This may be an indication of increasing attention paid by the vendors to do better testing. This marginal decrease is unlikely to have any immediate relief. There are plenty of vulnerabilities available for attackers to exploit.

Attackers are finding newer ways to gain access and more importantly to evade detection. The primary access still remains exploiting known vulnerabilities – “in 2014, 1 percent of high-urgency Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE) alerts were exploited”. Keeping those top 1% vulnerable applications patched becomes a very high priority activity. While patching may often involve conflicts, identifying what needs to be patched and actually patching them can easily be automated.

It is interesting to note that less than 50 % of the respondents use a standard tool to patch and keep the systems from being vulnerable. In addition, controlling misconfigurations are not automated either. “75 percent of respondents say that automated tools are very or extremely effective”. This is somewhat puzzling. Good tools can help reduce the risk of cyber-attacks and help correct misconfigurations while increasing the productivity of the employees.

Organizations with sophisticated security postures exhibited high level of leadership involvement, well documented clear security policies and Integrated tools that work well together. While management support and clear policies are very important, it is critical to have tools that automate security tasks. With the frequency of attacks manually managing security posture is next to impossible.

Security has always been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. While achieving good security involves conscientious effort on the part of everyone, tools that can help identify vulnerabilities is a good first step. It is important however, to have tools that not only prevent attacks by removing vulnerabilities, but also making sure that the tools are capable of remediating on-going attacks and provide insights into attacks that have already occurred.

Featured Posts

Open What Is a Kubernetes Network Policy?
What Is a Kubernetes Network Policy?

Point of View

What Is a Kubernetes Network Policy?

A Kubernetes network policy controls incoming and outgoing connections between Pods and other network destinations. The article explains how ingress and egress rules work, why default network access can create security risks, and how to configure and verify traffic restrictions. It also covers common policy mistakes and how Saner COSP's COAE and COPM modules support Kubernetes exposure visibility and configuration assessment.

Oct 16, 2026

Open Hybrid Cloud Security for Kubernetes Across Standalone, On-Prem, and Managed Clusters
Hybrid Cloud Security for Kubernetes Across Standalone, On-Prem, and Managed Clusters

Point of View

Hybrid Cloud Security for Kubernetes Across Standalone, On-Prem, and Managed Clusters

Hybrid cloud security for Kubernetes involves managing security risks across standalone, on-premises, and managed clusters. The blog explains the differences between Amazon EKS, Microsoft AKS, and Google GKE, common security challenges, and practical steps for maintaining consistent security controls. It also covers how Saner COSP helps teams assess configurations, manage access, prioritize risks, and track remediation across Kubernetes environments.

Oct 16, 2026

Open Excellence Is a Choice
Excellence Is a Choice

Point of View

Excellence Is a Choice

Oct 14, 2026

Open AWS Security Best Practices for Financial Services: Beyond Configuration Management
AWS_Security_Best_Practices_For_Financial_Services

Point of View

AWS Security Best Practices for Financial Services: Beyond Configuration Management

Oct 13, 2026