SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs

Key findings of CISCO ASR 2015

2015 CISCO Annual Security Report feels like a déjà vu. After all the song and dance, there are no surprises. Security has been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. People have always been used to gain access and continue to be unwitting participants.

Feb 2, 2015By Sindhu Rao3 min read

2015 CISCO Annual Security Report feels like a déjà vu. After all the song and dance, there are no surprises. Security has been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. People have always been used to gain access and continue to be unwitting participants.

The end points in an enterprise are often open invitations to attackers. The reluctance on the part of end users to patch their systems regularly, provides an easy entry for perpetrators to use them to access the network.

It is heartening to see a declining tendency in the cumulative vulnerabilities reported in 2014 compared to the total number reported in 2013. This may be an indication of increasing attention paid by the vendors to do better testing. This marginal decrease is unlikely to have any immediate relief. There are plenty of vulnerabilities available for attackers to exploit.

Attackers are finding newer ways to gain access and more importantly to evade detection. The primary access still remains exploiting known vulnerabilities – “in 2014, 1 percent of high-urgency Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE) alerts were exploited”. Keeping those top 1% vulnerable applications patched becomes a very high priority activity. While patching may often involve conflicts, identifying what needs to be patched and actually patching them can easily be automated.

It is interesting to note that less than 50 % of the respondents use a standard tool to patch and keep the systems from being vulnerable. In addition, controlling misconfigurations are not automated either. “75 percent of respondents say that automated tools are very or extremely effective”. This is somewhat puzzling. Good tools can help reduce the risk of cyber-attacks and help correct misconfigurations while increasing the productivity of the employees.

Organizations with sophisticated security postures exhibited high level of leadership involvement, well documented clear security policies and Integrated tools that work well together. While management support and clear policies are very important, it is critical to have tools that automate security tasks. With the frequency of attacks manually managing security posture is next to impossible.

Security has always been and will always continue to be a people centric problem. While achieving good security involves conscientious effort on the part of everyone, tools that can help identify vulnerabilities is a good first step. It is important however, to have tools that not only prevent attacks by removing vulnerabilities, but also making sure that the tools are capable of remediating on-going attacks and provide insights into attacks that have already occurred.

Featured Posts

Open The Future of Cloud Security Runs Through Containers
The Future of Cloud Security Runs Through Containers

Point of View

The Future of Cloud Security Runs Through Containers

Cloud security is moving closer to the workload. As containers and Kubernetes become standard infrastructure, security programs need to follow applications from build to runtime.

Nov 6, 2026

Open Attack Surface Risk Management: How to Prioritize Exposures
Attack Surface Risk Management: How to Prioritize Exposures

Point of View

Attack Surface Risk Management: How to Prioritize Exposures

Finding exposed assets is only the beginning. See how security teams can rank exposures using threat evidence, reachability, privilege, attack paths, and business context.

Nov 6, 2026

Open What Is an Attack Surface? Types and Examples
What Is an Attack Surface? Types and Examples

Point of View

What Is an Attack Surface? Types and Examples

An attack surface includes the systems, identities, services, interfaces, and physical access points an adversary could use to gain access or reach sensitive resources.

Nov 6, 2026

Open How to Move From Kubernetes Risk Discovery to Risk Reduction
How to Move From Kubernetes Risk Discovery to Risk Reduction

Point of View

How to Move From Kubernetes Risk Discovery to Risk Reduction

Kubernetes security teams can find thousands of misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and permission issues. Risk reduction depends on knowing which ones matter, fixing the underlying condition, and verifying the result.

Nov 2, 2026