You are currently viewing HTTP/1.1 Vulnerability: A Looming Threat to Millions of Websites

HTTP/1.1 Vulnerability: A Looming Threat to Millions of Websites

  • Post author:
  • Reading time:4 mins read

A fundamental vulnerability within the HTTP/1.1 protocol poses a significant threat to millions of websites, potentially allowing attackers to execute hostile takeovers through sophisticated request smuggling attacks. This flaw, rooted in the protocol’s design, creates ambiguity in request boundaries, enabling malicious manipulation of web traffic. This is an inherent protocol flaw, not merely an implementation bug, a threat that was first brought to prominence in 2019 and remains persistent in 2025.


Understanding the HTTP/1.1 Vulnerability

The core issue lies in HTTP/1.1’s message parsing mechanism, a fundamental design flaw that allows attackers to create extreme ambiguity about where one request ends and the next begins. This enables malicious actors to craft requests, using techniques such as Content-Length header manipulation and Transfer-Encoding: chunked discrepancies, to confuse reverse proxies and backend servers. These “desync” attacks exploit the inherent weakness in how HTTP/1.1 handles message boundaries, even bypassing years of vendor-implemented security mitigations. New attack classes, including “0.CL desync attacks” and “Expect-based desync attacks,” further demonstrate the evolving nature of this threat. “0.CL desync attacks,” previously thought unexploitable, are now viable through “early-response gadgets,” leveraging techniques like using reserved filenames on Windows IIS servers to trigger immediate responses.


Impact of HTTP/1.1 Request Smuggling

The impact of successful HTTP request smuggling can be severe:

  • Data Theft: Attackers can cause websites to misassociate responses with users, leading to the disclosure of confidential information.
  • Account Hijacking: Users may be logged into other live accounts without their consent.
  • Cache Poisoning: Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into website caches, gaining persistent control over web pages. This can enable the theft of passwords and credit card details.
  • Credential Theft: Attackers can steal passwords and credit card details.

This vulnerability affects core infrastructure within Content Delivery Networks (CDNs), exposing millions of websites despite years of mitigation efforts. Over 22 million websites, including major household names and critical CDN providers, have been identified as susceptible or accidentally compromised. A single accidental compromise through a major CDN’s infrastructure affected over 24 million websites. Simply using HTTPS does not protect against these attacks, as the vulnerability exists at the protocol level rather than the encryption layer. Research into this issue has revealed significant findings, highlighting the severity and prevalence of the issue, with notable examples involving major telecommunication companies, code repositories, password managers, and CDN providers.


TTPs Associated with HTTP/1.1 Exploitation

Attackers can leverage the following tactics, techniques, and procedures to exploit this vulnerability:

  • TA0001 – Initial Access: Attackers exploit public-facing web applications to inject malicious requests.
  • TA0005 – Defense Evasion: Attackers use request smuggling to bypass security controls.
  • TA0006 – Credential Access: Attackers may steal account credentials through cache poisoning.
  • T1190 – Exploit Public Facing Application: Attackers exploit a public-facing application to inject malicious requests.
  • T1573 – Protocol Manipulation: Attackers manipulate the HTTP protocol to inject malicious requests and achieve request smuggling.
  • T1003 – Credential Dumping: Attackers may obtain sensitive credentials by poisoning the cache and capturing user input.

Mitigation Strategies

The most effective solution is to migrate to upstream HTTP/2 connections between reverse proxies and origin servers. HTTP/2 eliminates the ambiguity that enables desync attacks by providing clear message boundaries and binary framing.

However, simply enabling HTTP/2 for client-facing connections is insufficient; the upstream connection to backend servers must also utilize HTTP/2 to prevent exploitation.

For organizations unable to immediately deploy upstream HTTP/2, the following steps are recommended:

  • Use the open-source HTTP Request Smuggler v3.0 tool to identify vulnerabilities. This latest version adds parser discrepancy detection for greater effectiveness.
  • Enable request validation and normalization features on front-end systems.
  • Consider disabling upstream connection reuse, despite potential performance impacts.
  • Actively engage with vendors about HTTP/2 support timelines.

Vendor Support and the Path Forward

Many major vendors currently lack upstream HTTP/2 support. This leaves millions of websites vulnerable until these platforms implement the necessary upgrades.

A comprehensive initiative titled “HTTP/1.1 Must Die: The Desync Endgame,” urges organizations to transition away from the vulnerable protocol and advocates for broader industry adoption of modern HTTP protocols.


Instantly Fix Risks with Saner Patch Management

Saner patch management is a continuous, automated, and integrated software that instantly fixes risks exploited in the wild. The software supports major operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS, as well as 550+ third-party applications.

It also allows you to set up a safe testing area to test patches before deploying them in a primary production environment. Saner patch management additionally supports a patch rollback feature in case of patch failure or a system malfunction.

Experience the fastest and most accurate patching software here.